Module  : Spam Hurdles
Version : 1.1.5
Author  : Maurice Makaay <maurice@phorum.org>

This module was developed against Phorum 5.1. It has been tested successfully
on Phorum 5.1.x and Phorum 5.2 installations. There is no support for
running this module on Phorum 5.0.

This module sets up some hurdles for forum spammers. It implements both
interactive and non-interactive anti-spam methods to keep away spam bots.
On the settings page, you can control exactly what hurdles to enable.

Interactive CAPTCHA's can be enabled for registering accounts and for
posting messages to the forum. Below, you will find a description of
all the CAPTCHA types that are available for this module.


Installation instructions:
--------------------------

- Unpack the archive;

- Move the directory "spamhurdles" to the directory "mods"
  within your Phorum installation;

- Login as administrator in Phorum's administrative interface and
  go to the "Modules" section;

- Enable the module "Spam Hurdles".

- Go to the settings page of the Spam Hurdles module to configure how
  you want the Spam Hurdles module to act.


Template change:

  If you are running a version of Phorum prior to 5.1.16 (or are using a
  template that was designed for 5.1.15 or older) and want to use the option
  to add a CAPTCHA to the registration process, then edit the register.tpl
  template(s) that are in use on your system. Add the code
  "{HOOK tpl_register_form}" right after the "</table>" in that file. The
  relevant part of that template will then look like this:

  ...
  </table>
  {HOOK tpl_register_form}
  <div style="float: left; margin-top: 5px;">*{LANG->Required}</div>
  ...

  For versions 5.1.16 and higher, this code is already in the default
  template. If you are using that template, then no change is needed.


Spoken CAPTCHA:
---------------

To help vision impaired people with solving CAPTCHA checks, it's possible
to have the CAPTCHA spoken by a speech synthesizer.

To make spoken CAPTCHA work, you need to have the program "Flite" installed
on your system. This is not something that I can help you with. Compilation
was pretty easy for me. I unpacked the sources, followed the build
instructions and finally copied the program "flite" over to /usr/local/bin
(the other parts of the package are not needed, only the flite binary).

For information on Flite, see:
http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/flite/

If people are using other speech synthesizers and want to have support
added to the Spam Hurdles for those, please contact me.


Description of the available CAPTCHA types:
-------------------------------------------

This module does support multiple types of CAPTCHA. Here is an overview
of the built-in CAPTCHA types, with a descriptions of their strong and
weak points.

********************************
* Code, drawn using JavaScript *
********************************

  This one uses only <div> elements to draw a CAPTCHA code. The <div>
  elements are used as pixels to build the characters. JavaScript code
  is used to create the "pixels" and move them to the right position in
  the CAPTCHA. Colors to use in the CAPTCHA are generated at random.

  I think that this might be a quite strong CAPTCHA (at least at the
  time of writing). Most CAPTCHA systems that exist nowadays make use
  of a real image for displaying the code. Spammers can easily grab
  those images to have them solved by humans in some way (workers in
  sweatshops and porn viewers are often mentioned in this respect).
  Because this system uses javascript and <div> elements to build the
  code, a real image file is never created. The code is only visible
  after rendering the HTML page and executing the JavaScript code.
  This all will make it hard for automated bots to grab a captcha
  "image" from the page.
  Also, this is a system that I made up myself and that I haven't
  encountered on my search for suitable CAPTCHA systems for Phorum.
  That might make it something totally new that spammers don't yet
  know.

  Pro:
  - Spammers might not yet be prepared for this type of CAPTCHA;
  - No real image is used. The code is only visible after rendering the page;
  - Because of the two previous pro's, the text does not have to be
    extremely distorted to work against spammers that use OCR (optical
    character recognition) to break CAPTCHA's.

  Contra:
  - The client will only be able to see the code if their browser
    supports JavaScript;
  - Not friendly for text-only browsers;
  - Not friendly for vision impaired people (enabling the spoken
    CAPTCHA is very much recommended when using this CAPTCHA type).

*********************************
* Code, drawn using a GIF image *
*********************************

  This one displays the CAPTCHA code using a GIF image. This is currently
  the de facto standard for creating CAPTCHA's on websites.

  For drawing characters, random fonts are used. The script
  automatically uses all available *.ttf font files that are in
  the module's directory mods/spamhurdles/captcha/fonts/
  There are several resources on the net which provide free ttf fonts
  that you can use for this CAPTCHA. See for example the site
  http://www.webpagepublicity.com/free-fonts.html

  Pro:
  - By using different fonts, colors, rotations and backgrounds, it's
    hard to solve this CAPTCHA by means of OCR;
  - Visitors are probably accustomed to this type of CAPTCHA.

  Contra:
  - Because a GIF image is used, this image can be easily grabbed from
    the page and presented to a human to have it solved;
  - Because of its wide spread use, spammers might be very prepared
    for handling this type of CAPTCHA;
  - Not friendly for text-only browsers;
  - Not friendly for vision impaired people (enabling the spoken
    CAPTCHA is very much recommended when using this CAPTCHA type).
  - This type of CAPTCHA requires the most system resources of them all.
    On most systems, this is not a problem. On performance sensitive
    systems however, you might consider using some other CAPTCHA type.

*******************************
* Code, drawn using ASCII art *
*******************************

  This one shows the CAPTCHA code using a simple ASCII art image. The
  HTML font size is kept small, so the ASCII art won't show up too large
  in the web page. Here's an example of how the code "UWGV9" would be
  formatted:

    **     **  **      **   ******    **     **   *******
    **     **  **  **  **  **    **   **     **  **     **
    **     **  **  **  **  **         **     **  **     **
    **     **  **  **  **  **   ****  **     **   ********
    **     **  **  **  **  **    **    **   **          **
    **     **  **  **  **  **    **     ** **    **     **
     *******    ***  ***    ******       ***      *******

  I'm not sure if this type of CAPTCHA can be read by vision
  impaired people, who use special tools for reading the screen.
  I do not think this format can be easily read by those people,
  but I found some references on the web where the same type of
  ASCII art based CAPTCHA's were created to help blind people.
  If anybody has conclusive information on this, let me know.

  Pro:
  - The CAPTCHA is easy to read;
  - The CAPTCHA can even be read from text-only browsers.

  Contra:
  - It is reasonably easy for spammers to write automated bots for
    bypassing this CAPTCHA;
  - Not friendly for vision impaired people (enabling the spoken
    CAPTCHA is very much recommended when using this CAPTCHA type).

***************************
* Code, plain text format *
***************************

  The simplest of them all. This CAPTCHA will not try to obfuscate the
  CAPTCHA code in any way. It will simply display the code as a plain
  text string on screen. Believe it or not, for a lot of websites, using
  this CAPTCHA will already stop a lot (if not all) spam messages.

  Pro:
  - The CAPTCHA is extremely easy to read;
  - The CAPTCHA can be read from text-only browser;
  - The CAPTCHA is fully readable for vision impaired people.

  Contra:
  - It is very easy for spammers to write automated bots for bypassing
    this CAPTCHA;

********************************
* Solve a simple math question *
********************************

  This CAPTCHA takes a different approach than the CAPTCHA systems above.
  Instead of generating a code that the user has to copy, this CAPTCHA
  generates a simple mathematics question (like "How much is 5 plus 21?").
  The user has to provide the correct answer to this question.

  Pro:
  - The CAPTCHA is extremely easy to read;
  - The CAPTCHA can be read from text-only browser;
  - The CAPTCHA is fully readable for vision impaired people.

  Contra:
  - It is reasonably easy for spammers to write automated bots for
    bypassing this CAPTCHA;

*************************************
* Code, using the reCAPTCHA service *
*************************************

  This CAPTCHA uses the service from http://recaptcha.net/ to display and
  check a CAPTCHA. The service uses digitally scanned books as the source
  for the CAPTCHA images. By solving CAPTCHAs, your users will participate
  in converting these books into real text. For information on how this
  CAPTCHA does do its job, please visit the reCAPTCHA web site.

  Pro:
  - The reason for setting up reCAPTCHA, was that the existing OCR software
    could not correctly read the scanned books. So it has been proven that
    the CAPTCHA itself is not really easy to process by a computer.
  - There is an audio CAPTCHA available as a backup for vision impaired
    people.
  - The service runs on the reCAPTCHA systems, so there's not much
    extra load on your server.
  - CAPTCHAs are solved for a good cause. It's not wasted time for your users.

  Contra:
  - Sometimes, the CAPTCHAs are hard to read for humans as well.
  - The CAPTCHA is added to the page using JavaScript. This makes the
    accessibility options less attractive, because they will probably
    not work for text-only browsers.


COMPARISON TABLE:

Below, I tried to do a comparison between the different CAPTCHA types.
Part of it is subjective of course (people who have trouble with math
will for example rate the MAPTCHA as being very user unfriendly :-),
but it does give a general idea.

+--------------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+
|              | user     | browser  | accessi- | hard for  |
| CAPTCHA type | friendly | friendly | bility   | spammers  |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+
| JavaScript   | +++      | ++       | +        | +++++     |
| GIF image    | +++      | +++      | +        | ++++      |
| ASCII art    | ++++     | ++++     | +++      | +++       |
| plain text   | +++++    | +++++    | +++++    | +         |
| MAPTCHA      | +++      | +++++    | +++++    | ++        |
| reCAPTCHA    | +++      | +++      | ++++     | ++++      |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+

